(S)word fight - United before and disputed behind the cameras!

The existing differences between the two political camps of Tamil Nadu have been shaping it with heated disputes as the party's line of control has been torched with sword fight, although they had seemingly pictured as the united party in ruling the state.

The ruling ADMK party of Tamil Nadu has been queuing up with the ruckus and turmoil that erupted from inside the party while its governance and its policies have been largely accused and criticized by the people and by the opposition political parties. There are handful of such episodes since the party's leader Jayalalithaa had expired in 2016 where the party's root was poured on with the acids that had cracked down the camps which still has been on the rise. Adding to that, the central leadership of the party led by the state Chief minister Edappadi Palaniswami and Deputy Chief minister Pannerselvam have again stepped into the ring of sword fight in the wake of inducting Pannerselvam's son and the only Lok Sabha MP of the party in the Union cabinet.

test

 

The 2019 general elections had different pictures to present for the ADMK and BJP alliance where in most of the states across India, BJP had gained and retained its victory while in Tamil Nadu, its alliance led by ADMK had managed to flag its victory in one Lok Sabha seat out of 39 constituencies that was won by O P Ravindranath Kumar, the elder son of the state's Deputy Chief minister Pannerselvam in his own constituency of Theni where it was termed as a hard line victory after Pannerselvam had unleashed all the possible ways to get his son into the parliament.

test

 

Since the victory, Pannerselvam has been demanding the BJP led Central government to induct his son in the union cabinet headed by Prime minister Narendra Modi and amidst his attempt, Modi had stated that the alliance party of ADMK will be reserved with one cabinet ministerial berth and directed the party's leadership to finalize the name and that's when the camps led by both Chief and Deputy Chief ministers had gone through with tug-of-words towards plucking the prospect where it was anticipated that the state Chief minister, with the motive of ignoring the cabinet post for Pannerselvam's son, had tabled the name of party's Rajya Sabha MP as his choice and due to the series of heated episodes of finalizing the name, the party had invited the loss of opportunity by their political drama that was indeed shaped more anger against each other and their respective camps.

test

 

After having been speculated that the BJP will enhance the cabinet by placing new faces in the sidelines of upcoming parliament session, the sword fight again resumed between the leaders to showcase their strength by naming their candidates to the Union cabinet and our reliable sources had said that as like last time, the Chief minister had again barricaded the rise of Pannerselvam and his son in the party by citing that the party will lead the negative examples of naming the son of Pannerselvam as Central minister while Pannerselvam has been the state Deputy Chief minister by ignoring the other senior leaders in the party. Our sources had added that Edappadi Palaniswami had demanded Pannerselvam to step down from the post of Deputy Chief minister if he wish his son to be inducted in the Union cabinet that had further deepened the anger of Pannerselvam with Palaniswami.

test

 

It has been reported that Edappadi Palaniswami has been diminishing the prospects in which Pannerselvam will rise again in the party by becoming the core and power of the party and denying the candidature of Pannerselvam's son is one among such weapons to take down the sword of Pannerselvam. However, on the other hand, the reports say that Pannerselvam has been in touch with Delhi to overrule Edappadi Palaniswami's control to name his son as Union minister. 

test

 

The sources from the BJP had revealed that the cabinet extension may get delayed and it won't be done in upcoming parliament session as the BJP's parental organization has been playing with words of disputes with Central government on its recommendations.

 

Comments